John Koufos (Leading with Conviction™ 2017) writes in The Washington Times:
“In Georgia and many other states, the risk of reoffending or fleeing is not the main factor in whether a person is released from jail before trial.
“Instead, a person’s freedom is largely dictated by access to funds. [Donald] Trump’s financial resources likely allowed him to post any amount of bail, regardless of risk.
“Not everyone is so fortunate. For many other low-risk but less well-resourced defendants, posting cash bail is difficult or impossible. While Mr. Trump walks free awaiting trial, thousands of Georgians accused of minor offenses remain locked up simply because they cannot afford to purchase their freedom. Worse still, taxpayers underwrite this unnecessary incarceration, straining already tight state budgets.
Wide-ranging support [for bail reform] from both policymakers and the public is rooted in evidence.
“There is an alternative. Some states and localities have implemented a risk-based bail system, sometimes known as bail reform. These reforms use data to measure a defendant’s risk of skipping their trial date or reoffending and then determine whether release, incarceration or, in some jurisdictions, cash bail is appropriate.
“Reforms like these have won over both Democratic and Republican constituencies — including in venues with a history of tough-on-crime policing and prosecution. In Harris County, Texas, for instance, conservative advocates and law enforcement leaders supported bail reforms that reduced incarceration rates while maintaining public safety.
“Unfortunately, Republicans are far from unified on this issue. Some Republicans, such as presidential candidate and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, have explicitly supported the continued use of money bail. By contrast, presidential candidate and former New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie implemented risk-based bail in his state, which protected public safety and advanced liberty.
“Since 2017, New Jersey has used a risk-based bail system. When someone is arrested, court staff conduct a public safety assessment that considers the type of offense, prior convictions (including violent convictions), the person’s history of missing court dates. Judges make the final call and are empowered to tailor their decisions to release, detain, or impose conditions on a specific defendant. …
“As a former federal prosecutor, Mr. Christie can hardly be described as soft on crime. What’s more, he was joined on this issue by New Jersey’s chief justice — a former state attorney general and federal prosecutor — as well as 62% of New Jersey voters, who approved a constitutional amendment that led to the new bail system.
“That wide-ranging support from both policymakers and the public is rooted in evidence. Research has proved that cash bail does not deter crime nor increase court appearance rates; bail reform, however, can achieve both.”
In our 10th anniversary year, JustLeadershipUSA’s work of educating, elevating, and empowering justice-impacted leaders continues and is growing even stronger!
This is going to be a very special time to look back on the past decade of JLUSA’s important work, the 1,600+ leaders we have helped get to the next level in their work, and even more importantly, we will look ahead to the next 10 years and beyond!
We can’t do this without you. We need your support to help us continue to do this work now and into the future. By making a donation in honor of JLUSA’s 10th anniversary year, you are saying to the amazing leaders in our network who represent the 70+ million Americans who have been directly impacted by the criminal legal system, “I see you, and I support you!”
Please give a one-time $100 gift or set up a recurring $10 monthly donation to celebrate JLUSA’s 10th anniversary year, and together we will build a fair and just U.S. Thank you!
Mail that includes checks only:
JUSTLEADERSHIPUSA, INC
P.O. Box 23681
New York, NY 10087-3681
All other mail:
P.O. Box 1730, New York, NY 10037
347.454.2195
© 2024 JustLeadershipUSA. All Rights Reserved.
JustLeadershipUSA is a non-partisan organization. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed belong solely to the individual author or speaker, and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the organization.